Gaslight digest of discussion for 97-apr-30





----------------------------THE HEADERS---------------------------



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:21:14 -0700 (MST)

From: "STEPHEN DAVIES, MT. ROYAL COLLEGE" 

Subject: Manitoba flooding = loss of novels [11404]



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:52:21 -0500 (EST)

From: Robert Champ 

Subject: Reeve's Three Alchemists [11405]



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:55:34 -0500 (EST)

From: Robert Champ 

Subject: Correction and query [11406]



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:04:53 -0500 (EST)

From: Robert Champ 

Subject: Gypsy lore query [11407]



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:24:37 -0500

From: ayc(at)ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (athan chilton)

Subject: Re: Gypsy lore query [11407] [11408]



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 15:26:55 -0500 (EST)

From: Robert Champ 

Subject: Re: Gypsy lore query [11407] [11408] [11409]



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:47:53 -0600 (CST)

From: Chris Carlisle 

Subject: Re: Gypsy lore query [11407] [11408] [11409] [11410]



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 16:20:16 -0400

From: Seth Foster 

Subject: Re: Manitoba flooding = loss of novels [11404] [11411]



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 19:51:01 -0400 (EDT)

From: Debah(at)aol.com

Subject: Re: Reeve's modern alchemy [11403] [11412]





-----------------------------THE POSTS-----------------------------





Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:21:14 -0700 (MST)

From: "STEPHEN DAVIES, MT. ROYAL COLLEGE" 

Subject: Manitoba flooding = loss of novels [11404]







         A reporter was interviewed on the radio about his experiences

         covering the Manitoba flooding (the Red River become the Red 

         Sea), and he related a story about an unnamed novelist he had

         spoken with.



         The novelist was scooping up his loose manuscripts and tossing

         them into his van because he had four hours to evacuate his

         home.



         Altho the flooding is causing widespread tragedy, none worse

         than loss of life, I thought you might be interested in 

         hearing what the novelist was having to sacrifice.



         He took the reporter upstairs and showed him North America's

         largest private collection of turn of the century first

         edition novels: 1300 titles.  That was his claim anyway.



         I can only hope these links with the past will escape serious

         damage.  I was reading Mario R.'s concern on Victorian-L that

         original materials from the Victorian era are disappearing

         (disintegrating?) all the time.  This may be a textbook 

         example of that.



                                          Stephen D

                                          SDavies(at)mtroyal.ab.ca

===0===



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:52:21 -0500 (EST)

From: Robert Champ 

Subject: Reeve's Three Alchemists [11405]







Reeve mentions three alchemists in "The Invisible Ray": Paracelsus, Simon

Forman, and Jerome Cardan.  At least two of these men do indeed 

resemble Dr. Prescott in that they mixed elements of occultism with

the practice of medicine.  (It is interesting that the triumvirate of scientists

that Reeve presents were physicists, chemists, i.e., practioners of the "hard

sciences," whereas medicine is a far more inexact science; indeed, it

can be more art than science.) 



Reeve's alchemists were not, however, without real scientific accomplishment, 

which makes me think that perhaps, in the character of Prescott, Reeve was 

not engaged in a little scientific speculation of his own, safely disguised in 

fictional form.  (Alas, I was only a poor English major in college and my 

ability to distinguish possibilities from falsehoods in science is hazy  

at best.)  In any case,  the material below, taken from various websites, 

gives some information on Reeve's collection of alchemists, all of whom

seemed to have lived in the 16th century.



There is a great deal of material available on Paracelsus, so I will content

myself with only two brief references to him.



From the A&E Biography site:



>>Paracelsus 



originally Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von 

Hohenheim (1493--1541) 



Alchemist and physician, born in Einsiedeln, Switzerland. He travelled 

widely in Europe and the Middle East, learning about alchemy, and 

acquiring great fame as a medical practitioner (1526). He became town 

physician and lecturer at Basel (1527), but his controversial views 

caused his exile in 1538. He travelled through Europe until settling at 

Salzburg in 1541. He established the use of chemistry in medicine, 

gave the most up-to-date description of syphilis, and was the first to 

argue that small doses of what makes people ill can also cure them.<< 



To this rather innocent-looking bio can be added the following from

the website  A Who's Who of Witches: 1100-1800



>>Traveled throughout Europe, practicing medicine, occultism, alchemy, 

prognostications. Wrote on sylphs, salamanders, nymphs: incorporating 

mystic elements into Germanic folk legends.



Noted for his magic speculum used in divination, for making which he 

offered detailed instructions. <<



About Simon Forman, I could only come up with the following from the

same website (i.e., A Who's Who of Witches: 1100-1800)



>>Dr. Forman



Seventeenth century astrologer and magician. Practiced image magic at 

court of King James VI of Scotland. <<



The most fascinating of the three, to me at least, was Jerome Cardan. Cardan

was a man of real achievement in the sciences but found himself constantly

embroiled in trouble because of his occult interests.  Here is a much more

complete bio. Than offered for Paracelsus and Simon Forman:



>>Girolamo Cardano



Born: 24 Sept 1501 in Pavia, Duchy of Milan (now Italy)

Died: 21 Sept 1576 in (now Italy)



Cardan is famed for his work Ars Magna which was the first Latin treatise 

devoted solely to algebra. Girolamo Cardano's name was Cardan in Latin 

and in English he is sometimes known as Jerome Cardan. Cardan studied 

at Pavia and Padua receiving a doctorate in medicine in 1525. He was 

professor of mathematics at Milan, Pavia and Bologna leaving each after 

some scandal. 



Cardan lectured and wrote on mathematics, medicine, astronomy, 

astrology, alchemy, and physics. In fact his fame as a doctor was such 

that the Archbishop of St Andrews, on suffering as he thought from 

consumption, sent for Cardan. Cardan is reported to have visited 

Scotland to treat the Archbishop who was not suffering from consumption 

and made a complete recovery. 



Cardan is famed for his work Ars Magna which was the first Latin 

treatise devoted solely to algebra and is one of the important steps in 

the rapid development in mathematics which began around this time 

(and still continues today). Ars Magna made known the solution of the 

cubic by radicals and the solution of the quartic by radicals. These 

were proved by Tartaglia and Ferrari respectively. Ferrari was in fact a 

pupil of Cardan's. 



In Ars Magna appears the first computation with complex numbers 

although Cardan did not properly understand it. 



Cardan's Liber de ludo aleae in 1563 was the first study of the theory of 

probability. De vita propria liber in 1575 is Cardan's autobiography. 

It is one of the first modern psychological autobiographies. 



Cardan was eventually forbidden to lecture or publish books. In 1570 

he was imprisioned on a charge of having cast the horoscope of Christ. 

In 1571 Pope Pius V granted him an annuity for life and he settled in 

Rome and became astrologer to the papal court. 



Cardan is reported to have correctly predicted the exact date of his own 

death. He achieved this by committing suicide. <<



 (Note: another source reports that it was not Pius V who sponsored

Cardan but Gregory XIII. "Pius would have nothing to do with him

since he had just been found guilty by the Inquisition.")



To give you an idea of some of Cardan's speculative writings, I offer

the following quotation from Cyrano de Bergerac's _A Voyage to

the Moon_.  In it, Cardan appears to have been involved in what

Ufologists call "a close encounter of the third kind":



>>Being come home, I went up into my Closet, where I found a Book

upon the Table, which I had not put there.  It was a piece of Cardanus,

and though I had no design to read in it, yet I fell at first sight, as

by force, exactly upon a Passage of that Philosopher, where he tells us,

That Studying one evening by Candle-light, he perceived Two Tall old

Men enter through the door that was shut, who after many questions

that he put to them, made him answer, That they were Inhabitants of

the Moon, and thereupon immediately disappeared.<<



The book in question is entitled _De Subtilitate Rerum_, which was

at the top of the European best-seller list in 1550 and considered one

of Cardan's best. (The determination of Cardan's best work depends

on the particular discipline of the person doing the judging.)  Cardan

is sometimes called the Italian Paracelsus.  He was involved in

nearly every branch of knowledge available to a sixteenth-century

scholar, including alchemy and necromancy.  At one site he was

also referred to as a "physiomancer," a word whose meaning I can't

guess, only that it must be a form of divination.



Quite a collection of individuals Reeve plucked out to include

in his story.



Bob Champ

rchamp(at)europa.umuc.edu

===0===



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:55:34 -0500 (EST)

From: Robert Champ 

Subject: Correction and query [11406]







In my post on the Three Alchemists, I said that it seemed to me that

Reeve was *not* engaging in scientific speculation. That "not" is

a mistake and should be omitted.



Could anyone tell me what image magic is?  Magic with mirrors, perhaps?

Or is this magic that involves making images of someone, as in voodoo?



Bob Champ

rchamp(at)europa.umuc.edu

===0===



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:04:53 -0500 (EST)

From: Robert Champ 

Subject: Gypsy lore query [11407]







I know that, on the decease of a gypsy, everything he/she owned is burned

in a ritual ceremony.  But what of the gypsy him or herself?  I can't

imagine that gypsies would have been buried in most cemeteries--so

was cremation a gypsy response? Or would cremation, if done, be a

holdover from the gypsy days in India where cremation is a common

practice?



Bob Champ

rchamp(at)europa.umuc.edu

===0===



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:24:37 -0500

From: ayc(at)ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (athan chilton)

Subject: Re: Gypsy lore query [11407] [11408]







Bob, in Jan Yoors' book, a gypsy who dies is buried--in a local

graveyard--with much hysterical behavior, esp. by the women.  Then

everybody goes back to camp, where those nearest to the deceased will fast

for a day or longer, stay up all night singing and lamenting, and drinking

in order to purge themselves of grief.  The book notes that the gaje were

startled at the violence of the Rom's behavior...



I have not heard of cremation among them, but do not know what current

practices may be among so-called 'settled' Rom.



Athan

ayc(at)ux1.cso.uiuc.edu





===0===



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 15:26:55 -0500 (EST)

From: Robert Champ 

Subject: Re: Gypsy lore query [11407] [11408] [11409]







Athan's comment about Gypsy reactions to funerals is given further

substance by the description in one of my books of a gypsy funeral

procession: "Among Hungarian gypsies a funeral procession is on

occasion a musical performance, consisting of the processional

mourners who follow the coffin while playing the violin, clarinet,

flute, cello."  This does not indicate cremation, though the hysterical

women and all the musical instruments going at the same time must have

created a wonderful cacophony.  



Yet, unless there were public cemeteries in many places on the circuits of

the various Gypsy bands, I can't think what was done with dead bodies.

I don't believe the Rom would have been given permission to bury their 

dead in most Christian cemeteries, which were the only cemeteries in 

some places. 



Perhaps the selection of the circuits was, in some degree, decided by such 

considerations.



As the Gypsies would say, Athan, _nais tuki_ ("thanks" in Romany).



Bob Champ

rchamp(at)europa.umuc.edu

===0===



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:47:53 -0600 (CST)

From: Chris Carlisle 

Subject: Re: Gypsy lore query [11407] [11408] [11409] [11410]







>Yet, unless there were public cemeteries in many places on the circuits of

>the various Gypsy bands, I can't think what was done with dead bodies.

>I don't believe the Rom would have been given permission to bury their 

>dead in most Christian cemeteries, which were the only cemeteries in 

>some places. 



Wait a minute, Bob--the "official" religion of most Rom is the religion

of the country in which they spend most of their time.  They do indeed

continue to follow their ancient purity rules and rituals, but they

are sometimes nominally and often sincerely Christians, Muslims, and

followers of other faiths.  Consider the heavy Rom presence at Ste.

Anne Beaupre and other Catholic shrines during festivals, for instance.



So I don't think that, in spite of their "irreligous" reputation, 

they would be denied burial in all Christian cemeteries.  AND, you 

must remember, there are many municipal cemeteries in Europe, to which

access is not controlled by the local clergy.



Kiwi Carlisle

carlisle(at)wuchem.wustl.edu



===0===



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 16:20:16 -0400

From: Seth Foster 

Subject: Re: Manitoba flooding = loss of novels [11404] [11411]







STEPHEN DAVIES, MT. ROYAL COLLEGE wrote:



>         damage.  I was reading Mario R.'s concern on Victorian-L that

>         original materials from the Victorian era are disappearing

>         (disintegrating?) all the time.  This may be a textbook

>         example of that.

> 

>                                         Stephen D

>                                         SDavies(at)mtroyal.ab.ca



Disintegrating due to acidity or just plain being kept in an attic where

the mice and the silverfish get at them, being tossed out as too old to

be interesting, whatever.



What I was especially talking about on victorian-l, though, was that a

lot of material is simply unavailable.  Some of it is out of print. 

Other things were never published in the first place -- diaries,

letters, and the like.  Some of *these* things are being tossed out,

too, by people who simply do not realize the value of the glimpses into

history they provide.  Others are being stored, sometimes even under

excellent conditions, but because they are unique they are limited to

the library or collection that stores them -- and they are also rendered

inaccessible simply because researchers don't know the things are there.



Mario Rups

markin(at)patriot.net

===0===



Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 19:51:01 -0400 (EDT)

From: Debah(at)aol.com

Subject: Re: Reeve's modern alchemy [11403] [11412]







I enjoyed this story and it's antiquated science very much.  Perhaps like

S.T. said we are removed enough from the period that it's not bad science

anymore but something more on the level of the original alchemists.  Although

I picked up immediately on the clue of the blue eyes and wondered where they

got this dark eyed daughter (like we didn't know anyway that SOMETHING WAS

WRONG, this was just the final proof).  I really couldn't pick that many

holes in the theory of Prescott's new force.  However, what put me off his

theories wasn't the idea of the lifeforce or its capability of changing

copper to gold (staying within element groups) but the addition of the occult

aspect of telepathy.  The minute that was added into it just became too much.

 All I could think was "Prescott, you're cramming too much in to make this

scientific."  Crossing over into the occult seriously devalued his scientific

credibility.  But in the times it was written this certainly wouldn't have

been seen as the same kind of obstacle when we think of Mesmerism, seances

and other ways to reach beyond. 



But after reading this I'm afraid I actually missed what kind of ray this was

that could create temporary blindness (for however long) and the skin rashes.

 Radioactive?  Xray?  For some reason at the end I was looking to find the

clues to a real kind of invisible ray.  Was it Xray and I somehow misread?

 What was surprising was bringing back the old man to life w/o permanent

oxygen deprivation to his brain.  More than 7 minutes?  Or was he only

"mostly dead".  I was glad he was brought back because it would be so unfair,

at least he had a chance to truly make amends with his real daughter.  But

wouldn't he have had serious brain damage?  Okay, I'm asking too much of the

science again.



It doesn't matter.  I enjoyed the story regardless and am more than willing

to suspend some belief for the required effect of the period.  Interesting.

Deborah



Deborah McMillion

debah(at)aol.com

http://www.primenet.com/~bucanek/

  

End of Gaslight digest.